
Managing and maintaining their own FlexLM license server, I’d wager a majority While plenty of Autodesk clients are perfectly comfortable On the other hand, after supportingĬlients with network and multi-user subscriptions for approximately 10 years, IĪlso appreciate how many Autodesk customers struggle with FlexLM. Someone who has managed or helped clients manage FlexLM license servers for roughlyġ5 years, none of this is a big deal to me. Whether the present-day management of multi-user licenses isĪ pain point for you will likely depend on the size of your organization. Software managers must create new license files each time Autodesk releases a Since license (LIC) files include but one product, each product orĬontract in your portfolio must be combined into a single LIC file. Must install, configure, and manage a FlexLM network license server of their Of and is, therefore, a more accessible model for customers to manage.īy contrast, under the current multi-user model, customers Is granted to individuals, there are no serial numbers to manage and keep track

Promoted as a simplification of existing licensing management. Question of how this shift benefits you today? The named-user model is being While it will be interesting to see how this goal is realized, but I think technologies like Microsoft’s MyAnalytics for Office 365 are a present-day example of where Autodesk is going with the single-user model.Īlthough future-looking benefits are great, it still leaves the With so many mid to large-sized organizations choosing multi-user subscriptions because of the benefits it provides to them, why is Autodesk making this change? The explanation offered by Autodesk is to provide a more relevant user experience.
